Home | DUI Today | Sitemap | Glossary |   DUI Laws In Different City |   Alcohol Awareness | DUI Lawyers and DUI Attorneys | DUI Defense Attorney and Lawyer | DUI Introduction
 
 
 
 

How to get out of a DUI?

After examining the details of DUI charge, developing a strategy and defending the DUI charge with the help of a DUI attorney or Lawyer alone can help you to get out of a DUI conviction. Following circumstances can help you in developing a defense strategy .

 

 

Ways to beat DUI in New Jersey

  • The enforcement officers should have sufficient reason for stopping a person for sobriety test. Halting under a different circumstance and convicting under DUI offence is quite common.
  • The accused should be given Miranda Warning before conviction under DUI, failure on the part of the officer is a good defense.
  • Intoxication at the time of driving should be proved by the field officers.
  • BAC test should be performed under certain preset clinical conditions in order to ensure accurate results. Any deviation will be a reason to defend.
  • Rules have been framed to regulate Field Sobriety Test conducted by administering officers. Non compliance will lead to dismissal of DUI charge.
  • Administrative hearing for license suspension often brings to light mistakes committed by field officers.
  • Normally the absorption stage of alcohol differs from person to person ranging between one to three hours; a BAC test result at this stage could be inaccurate.
  • Where a person convicted under a DUI charge is under a prescribed diet or intake of medicines for health reasons, the test results can be defended under medical reasons and the consequent inconsistency in test results.
  • A major drawback with the Breathalyzer Test is that, the results are often inaccurate due to wrong recognition of chemicals as alcohol. It is indeed a strong reason for defense.
  • Where the accused has not been informed about the consequences of FST (Field Sobriety Test) or was given false information, suspension of license by DMV stands invalidated.
  • Lack of sufficient proof that you were driving under influence is a sufficient defense in your favor. The field officer’s statement that you were under influence will be cross examined accordingly.